I'm not a big fan of wedgies, although of course I take zillions of them, just like most of us. Well, maybe fewer than I used to, but still, plenty. But sometimes that is what can be done, or sometimes doing something else is a lot of effort and one is constrained by time or company. So, can one max out the wedge?
Well, here's one example, by Mitch Goldman (captioned version here). Now, this one is not constrained; taken during a photo charter. But there wasn't much to work with, in terms of immediate scenery. So what does one do? Do a pan, as Mitch is wont to do? Tele-smash? Mitch went wide, not ultra-wide (17mm on a crop body), but wide. But what else did he get in the shot?
First, there is something about the way the wide angle enhances the angle of the pilot (and the far grabiron on the nose) that gives the shot a stronger dynamic feel than most shots. Of course, can't do that with a diesel (unless it's something like an EMD E)!
Furthermore, the sky is helpful. Not glorious, but it contributes, as the lines in the clouds, a gentle diagonal from the left edge, the near-vertical diagonal of the leading cloud edge coming down from the top, draw the eye to the engine. Some of the swirls near the top give a subtle framing to the plume. (Too subtle? So subtle that this comment is a real stretch, making something of what is really nothing?) The sky has an interesting presence, not at all strong, but not blank blue either. Furthermore, the relatively monotoned gray plume sets off beautifully against the white.
Up front, the whitish grasses help enhance the presence of the black engine. Finally, the linepole adding just enough to make it more of a scene than a roster (of course, the trailing cars also, but the pole does a lot). Call it an action-wedgie-portrait. :) Not an excellent shot, but a really likeable shot. It has grown on me. Mitch got out of it all that was there and a bit more.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hello !
I fully agree with your comment about the use of wide angle. This is one of my favorite way to do original pictures. Many people are a bit lost because the angle distort perspectives. But it makes the train more powerful, especially when the photographer has a low position.
Here are two examples of such use of wide-angle lens :
http://tinyurl.com/6h3pcp
Another point on Mitch's picture is the post-processing. He did a great job, creating a great black & white picture. It's not just gray transformation but a real b&w shot. And the picture goes well as the locomotive and smoke create a black weight on the composition.
Renaud
Wow, that's a great picture!
It's a great example to how much a little effort can produce in photography. The subject in itself wa somewhat unique and most photographers would have been content just to take a good, smokey, but in any other sense everyday shot of it, but not Mitch! I believe that unique dishes deserve unique serving and wide-angle is a powerful tool for it.
I once heard from a fellow railway photographer that ultra-wide angle will sort out any compositional errors of a picture so he uses it most times so he doesn't have to care. I think that's ridiculous. Wide-angle is a very different language of photography and speaking it demands the photographer to be full-heartedly devoted to it. It's in the distortion. It can easily ruin a picture if you take a wide shot just as you would with a standard lens, but a real wide-angle shot can make you feel being there, make you be inside, make you feel like you can see everything in the photo but still having a clear focus.
I have a similar shot where also wide angle and magnificient clouds make the photo work:
http://benbe.extra.hu/gallery/bcmot/pic16_noframe_hun.php
Keep on with this great blog!
Benbe
Post a Comment